Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 by Matthew K. Gold,Lauren F. Klein

By Matthew K. Gold,Lauren F. Klein

Pairing full-length scholarly essays with shorter items drawn from scholarly blogs and convention shows, in addition to commissioned interviews and place statements, Debates within the electronic Humanities 2016 unearths a dynamic view of a box in negotiation with its id, equipment, and achieve. items within the booklet discover how DH can and needs to switch based on social justice routine and occasions like #Ferguson; how DH alters and is altered by means of group university study rooms; and the way students utilising DH techniques to feminist stories, queer stories, and black reviews may perhaps reframe the commitments of DH analysts. quite a few members learn the stream of interdisciplinary DH paintings into parts reminiscent of background, paintings historical past, and archaeology, and a distinct discussion board on large-scale textual content mining brings jointly place statements on a fast-growing region of DH examine. within the multivalent facets of its arguments, progressing throughout more than a few systems and environments, Debates within the electronic Humanities 2016 deals a imaginative and prescient of DH as an elevated field—new percentages, in a different way structured.

Published at the same time in print, booklet, and interactive webtext codecs, every one DH annual should be a book-length e-book highlighting the actual debates that experience formed the self-discipline in a given 12 months. by way of settling on key concerns as they spread, and by way of delivering a hybrid version of open-access booklet, those volumes and the Debates within the electronic Humanities sequence will articulate the current contours of the sector and aid forge its future.

Contributors: Moya Bailey, Northeastern U; Fiona Barnett; Matthew Battles, Harvard U; Jeffrey M. Binder; Zach Blas, U of London; Cameron Blevins, Rutgers U; Sheila A. Brennan, George Mason U; Timothy Burke, Swarthmore university; Rachel Sagner Buurma, Swarthmore university; Micha Cárdenas, U of Washington–Bothell; Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Brown U; Tanya E. Clement, U of Texas–Austin; Anne Cong-Huyen, Whittier collage; Ryan Cordell, Northeastern U; Tressie McMillan Cottom, Virginia Commonwealth U; Amy E. Earhart, Texas A&M U; Domenico Fiormonte, U of Roma Tre; Paul Fyfe, North Carolina nation U; Jacob Gaboury, Stony Brook U; Kim Gallon, Purdue U; Alex Gil, Columbia U; Brian Greenspan, Carleton U; Richard Grusin, U of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Michael Hancher, U of Minnesota; Molly O’Hagan Hardy; David L. Hoover, manhattan U; Wendy F. Hsu; Patrick Jagoda, U of Chicago; Jessica Marie Johnson, Michigan kingdom U; Steven E. Jones, Loyola U; Margaret Linley, Simon Fraser U; Alan Liu, U of California, Santa Barbara; Elizabeth Losh, U of California, San Diego; Alexis Lothian, U of Maryland; Michael Maizels, Wellesley university; Mark C. Marino, U of Southern California; Anne B. McGrail, Lane group university; Bethany Nowviskie, U of Virginia; Julianne Nyhan, U collage London; Amanda Phillips, U of California, Davis; Miriam Posner, U of California, l. a.; Rita Raley, U of California, Santa Barbara; Stephen Ramsay, U of Nebraska–Lincoln; Margaret Rhee, U of Oregon; Lisa Marie Rhody, Graduate middle, CUNY; Roopika Risam, Salem kingdom U; Stephen Robertson, George Mason U; Mark pattern, Davidson collage; Jentery Sayers, U of Victoria; Benjamin M. Schmidt, Northeastern U; Scott Selisker, U of Arizona; Jonathan Senchyne, U of Wisconsin, Madison; Andrew Stauffer, U of Virginia; Joanna Swafford, SUNY New Paltz; Toniesha L. Taylor, Prairie View A&M U; Dennis Tenen; Melissa Terras, U collage London; Anna Tione; Ted Underwood, U of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign; Ethan Watrall, Michigan country U; Jacqueline Wernimont, Arizona country U; Laura Wexler, Yale U; Hong-An Wu, U of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign.

Show description

Read Online or Download Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 PDF

Similar philosophy criticism books

The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic

This booklet is without doubt one of the most vital fresh books on Hegel, a thinker who has had a very important influence at the form of continental philosophy. released right here in English for the 1st time, it contains a titanic preface via Jacques Derrida during which he explores the subjects and conclusions of Malabou's e-book.

Radical French Thought and the Return of the "Jewish Question" (Studies in Antisemitism)

For English-speaking readers, this booklet serves as an advent to an enormous French highbrow whose paintings, specially at the problems with antisemitism and anti-Zionism, runs counter to the hostility proven towards Jews by way of a few representatives of latest serious concept. It offers for the 1st time in English 5 essays by means of Éric Marty, formerly released in France, with a brand new preface via the writer addressed to his American readers.

Quentin Meillassoux (Speculative Realism EUP)

An in-depth examine of the rising French thinker Quentin MeillassouxIn this increased variation of his landmark 2011 paintings on Meillassoux, Graham Harman covers new fabrics no longer to be had to the Anglophone reader on the time of the 1st version. in addition to Meillassoux's startling ebook on Mallarmé's poem "Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard," Harman discusses a number of new English articles by way of Meillassoux, together with his debatable April 2012 Berlin lecture and its critique of "subjectalism.

Hume's Challenge and the Renewal of Modern Philosophy

"Three hundred and fifty years after the dying of René Descartes, the straightforward matters raised by way of the founding father of smooth philosophy in regards to the nature of the psychological services and actions of human organisms - or the 'mind,' as he considered such capabilities - couldn't be acknowledged to were resolved. questions about the character of cognizance are the top instance.

Extra resources for Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016

Example text

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 34 votes